Model comparison

Seed 2.0 Pro vs Muse Spark

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 43.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Seed 2.0 Pro ByteDance Seed

43.2

Rank #96 Confirmed

Muse Spark Meta

50.6

Rank #46 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark in 9 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 40.2.

Side by side

Seed 2.0 Pro and Muse Spark specifications
Seed 2.0 ProMuse Spark
ProviderByteDance SeedMeta
Noometry Index43.250.6
Released2026-02-142026-04-08
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window256K—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.50—
Output $ / M tokens$3—
Results tracked2027

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86), Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMuse Spark
LMArena Coding14721481
SciCode—51.5%

Reasoning Muse Spark leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165), Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMuse Spark
LMArena Hard Prompts14531474
NYT Connections (extended)28.4%—
CritPt—11.3%
Thematic Generalization57.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index—152.04

Math Muse Spark leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108), Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMuse Spark
LMArena Math14391455
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—88.9%
ProofBench—17%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—39%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—14.6%

Knowledge Muse Spark leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122), Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMuse Spark
LMArena Expert14401457
GPQA Diamond—89.8%
Humanity's Last Exam—40.6%

Multimodal Muse Spark leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35), Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMuse Spark
LMArena Vision12741306
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Muse Spark leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39), Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMuse Spark
LMArena Non-English14411464
LMArena Chinese14891509
LMArena French14711497
LMArena German14421497
LMArena Korean14111459
LMArena Russian14491466
LMArena Spanish14601472
LMArena Japanese1408—

Instruction Following Muse Spark leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91), Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMuse Spark
LMArena Instruction Following14141442

Long Context Too close to call

Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90), Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMuse Spark
LMArena Longer Query14281451

Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69), Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMuse Spark
LMArena Text14481474
LMArena Creative Writing14061459
LMArena Multi-Turn14411477

Frequently asked questions

Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Muse Spark?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 43.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Seed 2.0 Pro or Muse Spark better for coding?

Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 43.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Muse Spark share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper