Model comparison
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 vs MiMo-V2-Pro
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and MiMo-V2-Pro score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.1 vs 43.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher in 2 categories and MiMo-V2-Pro in 4 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 28.9 to 22.1.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 43.0 |
| Released | — | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119), MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1418 | 1476 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1433 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.17 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97), MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1416 | 1457 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 25.8% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |
Math Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1447 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1478 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84), MiMo-V2-Pro: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1180 | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125), MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1382 | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1456 |
| LMArena French | — | 1469 |
| LMArena German | — | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1366 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1400 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1427 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1457 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117), MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1397 | 1445 |
Long Context Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1404 | 1455 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100), MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1405 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1388 | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1422 | 1456 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better than MiMo-V2-Pro?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and MiMo-V2-Pro score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.1 vs 43.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 41.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and MiMo-V2-Pro share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.