Noometry

Model comparison

Seed 2.0 Pro vs MiMo-V2-Pro

Seed 2.0 Pro and MiMo-V2-Pro score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.2 vs 43.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

Seed 2.0 Pro ByteDance Seed

43.2

Rank #96 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Pro Xiaomi

43.0

Rank #103 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 4 categories and MiMo-V2-Pro in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Thematic Generalization: 57.1% for Seed 2.0 Pro and 45.9% for MiMo-V2-Pro.
  • MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $3 for Seed 2.0 Pro.
  • MiMo-V2-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 256K.

Side by side

Seed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2-Pro
ProviderByteDance SeedXiaomi
Noometry Index43.243.0
Released2026-02-142026-03-18
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window256K1.05M
Max output128K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.50$0.43
Output $ / M tokens$3$0.87
Results tracked2023

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86), MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Coding14721476
LMArena WebDev—1433
ALE-Bench—785.17

Reasoning Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165), MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2-Pro
NYT Connections (extended)28.4%25.8%
Thematic Generalization57.1%45.9%
LMArena Hard Prompts14531457

Math Too close to call

Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108), MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Math14391447

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Expert14401478

Multimodal Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35), MiMo-V2-Pro: —

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Vision1274—

Multilingual Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39), MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Non-English14411416
LMArena Chinese14891456
LMArena French14711469
LMArena German14421417
LMArena Japanese14081366
LMArena Korean14111400
LMArena Russian14491427
LMArena Spanish14601457

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91), MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following14141445

Long Context Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Longer Query14281455
CL-bench—15.7%
CL-bench Life—6.9%

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69), MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Text14481436
LMArena Creative Writing14061415
LMArena Multi-Turn14411456

Frequently asked questions

Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than MiMo-V2-Pro?

Seed 2.0 Pro and MiMo-V2-Pro score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.2 vs 43.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Pro or MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Seed 2.0 Pro lists at $0.50 and $3.

Is Seed 2.0 Pro or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (43.5 vs 43.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and MiMo-V2-Pro share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper