Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 vs Llama 4 Scout

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 27.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 Tencent

43.1

Rank #98 Confirmed

Llama 4 Scout Meta

27.7

Rank #330 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher in 7 categories and Llama 4 Scout in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 60.1 to 37.0.
  • Llama 4 Scout has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Vision 1.5Llama 4 Scout
ProviderTencentMeta
Noometry Index43.127.7
Released—2025-04-05
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.30
Results tracked943

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119), Llama 4 Scout: 20.2 (#339)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Llama 4 Scout
LMArena Coding14181286
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—9.1%
SciCode—17%
BigCodeBench Complete—43.1%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Llama 4 Scout: 24.6 (#119)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Llama 4 Scout
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—28.1%

Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97), Llama 4 Scout: 9.1 (#345)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Llama 4 Scout
LMArena Hard Prompts14161266
ARC-AGI-2—0%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—36.9%
ARC-AGI-1—0.5%
CritPt—0%
DTBench—57.9%
LMCA—12%
Epoch Capabilities Index—129.64
ForecastBench—57.5

Math Not comparable

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Llama 4 Scout: 19.6 (#286)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Llama 4 Scout
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—7.8%
Omni-MATH—37.3%
LMArena Math—1287
MATH Level 5—62.3%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—0%

Knowledge Not comparable

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Llama 4 Scout: 31.9 (#217)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Llama 4 Scout
GPQA Diamond—51.8%
MMLU-Pro—74.2%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—7.7%
GPQA (HELM)—50.7%
LMArena Expert—1235

Multimodal Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84), Llama 4 Scout: 32.2 (#102)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Llama 4 Scout
LMArena Vision11801118
SpatialViz-Bench—34.2%

Multilingual Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125), Llama 4 Scout: 41.0 (#212)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Llama 4 Scout
LMArena Non-English13821252
LMArena Chinese—1255
LMArena French—1282
LMArena German—1272
LMArena Japanese—1206
LMArena Korean—1207
LMArena Russian—1263
LMArena Spanish—1278

Instruction Following Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117), Llama 4 Scout: 65.8 (#217)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Llama 4 Scout
LMArena Instruction Following13971248
IFEval—81.8%

Long Context Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115), Llama 4 Scout: 27.5 (#294)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Llama 4 Scout
LMArena Longer Query14041265
Fiction.LiveBench—36%

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100), Llama 4 Scout: 37.0 (#261)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Llama 4 Scout
LMArena Text14051279
LMArena Creative Writing13881249
LMArena Multi-Turn14221280
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—783
WildBench—78%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better than Llama 4 Scout?

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 27.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 or Llama 4 Scout better for coding?

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 20.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and Llama 4 Scout share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Llama 4 Scout has 43.

Related comparisons

Go deeper