Model comparison
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 vs Llama 3-8B
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
MetaSummary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 3-8B in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 60.1 to 37.5.
- Llama 3-8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Llama 3-8B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 25.5 |
| Released | — | 2024-04-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 34 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119), Llama 3-8B: 31.0 (#289)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1418 | 1152 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 31.9% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 36.9% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 56.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 54.8% |
Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97), Llama 3-8B: 14.3 (#326)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1416 | 1133 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| DTBench | — | 43.9% |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 57.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 116.45 |
| ForecastBench | — | 58.6 |
| WinoGrande | — | 75.7% |
Math Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Llama 3-8B: 8.8 (#323)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 1.9% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1151 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 6.1% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Llama 3-8B: 7.8 (#308)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 26.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1113 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 82.8% |
| MMLU | — | 68.8% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 82.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 67.7% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84), Llama 3-8B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1180 | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125), Llama 3-8B: 30.8 (#261)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1382 | 1098 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1076 |
| LMArena French | — | 1159 |
| LMArena German | — | 1104 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 967 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1004 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1109 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1173 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117), Llama 3-8B: 58.4 (#260)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1397 | 1127 |
Long Context Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115), Llama 3-8B: 34.2 (#251)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1404 | 1128 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100), Llama 3-8B: 37.5 (#256)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1405 | 1166 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1388 | 1150 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1422 | 1152 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better than Llama 3-8B?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 or Llama 3-8B better for coding?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 31.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and Llama 3-8B share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-8B has 34.