Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs Hunyuan Vision 1.5
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 41.8 to 26.2.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 25.2 | 43.1 |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1418 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1416 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.27 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
Math Not comparable
Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1180 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1382 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1397 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1404 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1405 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1388 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1422 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than Hunyuan Vision 1.5?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 2.1 or Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better for coding?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9.