Model comparison
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 vs Hy3
Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher in 1 category and Hy3 in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Hy3 leads 46.8 to 41.8.
- Hy3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Hy3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 44.2 |
| Released | — | 2026-07-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.0825 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.33 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hy3 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119), Hy3: 46.8 (#63)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1418 | 1464 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1508 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97), Hy3: 26.1 (#136)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1416 | 1447 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 41.2% |
Math Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Hy3: 40.1 (#93)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1475 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Hy3: 40.8 (#114)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1460 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84), Hy3: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1180 | — |
Multilingual Hy3 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125), Hy3: 53.5 (#65)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1382 | 1426 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1493 |
| LMArena French | — | 1461 |
| LMArena German | — | 1439 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1392 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1432 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1456 |
Instruction Following Hy3 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117), Hy3: 75.1 (#70)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1397 | 1426 |
Long Context Hy3 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115), Hy3: 44.1 (#75)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1404 | 1442 |
Writing & Preference Hy3 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100), Hy3: 62.2 (#81)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1405 | 1439 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1388 | 1402 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1422 | 1436 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better than Hy3?
Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 or Hy3 better for coding?
Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 41.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and Hy3 share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Hy3 has 19.