Model comparison

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 vs Inkling

Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 42.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 Tencent

42.6

Rank #95 Confirmed

Inkling Thinking Machines Lab

44.1

Rank #75 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher in 1 category and Inkling in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Inkling leads 40.6 to 27.8.
  • Inkling has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and Inkling specifications
Hunyuan Vision 1.5Inkling
ProviderTencentThinking Machines Lab
Noometry Index42.644.1
Released—2026-07-15
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—66K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.87
Output $ / M tokens—$4.68
Results tracked941

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.2 (#119), Inkling: 34.1 (#229)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Inkling
LMArena Coding14191463
FrontierCode—14%
LMArena WebDev—1412
FrontierSWE—4.1%
SciCode—47%
WeirdML—32.3%
ALE-Bench—946

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Inkling: 29.5 (#76)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Inkling
APEX-Agents—33.8%
τ²-bench Banking—25%

Reasoning Inkling leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 27.8 (#96), Inkling: 40.6 (#48)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Inkling
LMArena Hard Prompts14171452
ARC-AGI-2—36.5%
SimpleBench—50%
ARC-AGI-1—79.5%
CritPt—5.4%
Chess Puzzles—21%
DTBench—87.5%
LMCA—37.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index—148.6

Math Not comparable

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Inkling: 31.2 (#198)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Inkling
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—33.3%
FrontierMath Tier 4—4.9%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—88.9%
ProofBench—0%
LMArena Math—1482

Knowledge Not comparable

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Inkling: 55.2 (#44)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Inkling
GPQA Diamond—88.3%
SimpleQA Verified—40.3%
LMArena Expert—1468

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.1 (#78), Inkling: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Inkling
LMArena Vision1180—

Multilingual Inkling leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.5 (#118), Inkling: 54.2 (#49)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Inkling
LMArena Non-English13831434
LMArena Chinese—1495
LMArena French—1453
LMArena German—1456
LMArena Japanese—1428
LMArena Korean—1401
LMArena Russian—1430
LMArena Spanish—1442

Instruction Following Inkling leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.9 (#110), Inkling: 75.3 (#65)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Inkling
LMArena Instruction Following13981427

Long Context Inkling leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#110), Inkling: 43.9 (#79)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Inkling
LMArena Longer Query14051436

Writing & Preference Inkling leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.4 (#95), Inkling: 65.5 (#48)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Inkling
LMArena Text14071443
LMArena Creative Writing13891390
LMArena Multi-Turn14231436
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1611
EQ-Bench 4—1226

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better than Inkling?

Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 42.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 or Inkling better for coding?

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.2 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and Inkling share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Inkling has 41.

Related comparisons

Go deeper