Model comparison
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs Ring-2.6-1T
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has enough public results to be ranked (#139); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Ant Group (inclusionAI)Summary
- Ring-2.6-1T has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Ring-2.6-1T | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Ant Group (inclusionAI) |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 36.9 |
| Released | — | 2026-05-14 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152), Ring-2.6-1T: 40.7
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 42.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 432.57 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113), Ring-2.6-1T: 26.1
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | — |
Math Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1359 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1363 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1417 | — |
| LMArena French | 1391 | — |
| LMArena German | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1342 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1351 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1368 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1344 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1366 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1359 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1387 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than Ring-2.6-1T?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has enough public results to be ranked (#139); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or Ring-2.6-1T better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (40.0 vs 40.7); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Ring-2.6-1T share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.