Model comparison

GLM-4.6V vs Ring-2.6-1T

GLM-4.6V has enough public results to be ranked (#137); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.6V Z.ai (Zhipu)

41.3

Rank #137 Confirmed

Side by side

GLM-4.6V and Ring-2.6-1T specifications
GLM-4.6VRing-2.6-1T
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Ant Group (inclusionAI)
Noometry Index41.336.9
Released2025-12-082026-05-14
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K—
Max output33K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.30—
Output $ / M tokens$0.90—
Results tracked123

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128), Ring-2.6-1T: 40.7

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6VRing-2.6-1T
SciCode—42.4%
LMArena Coding1390—
ALE-Bench—432.57

Reasoning GLM-4.6V leads

GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115), Ring-2.6-1T: 26.1

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6VRing-2.6-1T
CritPt—3.7%
LMArena Hard Prompts1368—

Knowledge Not comparable

GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149), Ring-2.6-1T: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6VRing-2.6-1T
LMArena Expert1371—

Multimodal Not comparable

GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90), Ring-2.6-1T: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6VRing-2.6-1T
LMArena Vision1164—

Multilingual Not comparable

GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141), Ring-2.6-1T: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6VRing-2.6-1T
LMArena Non-English1359—
LMArena Chinese1425—
LMArena Russian1340—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151), Ring-2.6-1T: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6VRing-2.6-1T
LMArena Instruction Following1352—

Long Context Not comparable

GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143), Ring-2.6-1T: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6VRing-2.6-1T
LMArena Longer Query1358—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137), Ring-2.6-1T: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6VRing-2.6-1T
LMArena Text1377—
LMArena Creative Writing1347—
LMArena Multi-Turn1360—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-4.6V better than Ring-2.6-1T?

GLM-4.6V has enough public results to be ranked (#137); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is GLM-4.6V or Ring-2.6-1T better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (40.9 vs 40.7); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6V and Ring-2.6-1T share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6V has 12 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper