Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 Tencent

41.3

Rank #139 Confirmed

Qwen3.6 Max Preview Alibaba (Qwen)

51.5

Rank #43 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Max Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads 57.6 to 37.0.

Side by side

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226Qwen3.6 Max Preview
ProviderTencentAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index41.351.5
Released—2026-04-20
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.30
Output $ / M tokens—$7.80
Results tracked1629

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 48.7 (#54)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Coding13611471
SWE-bench Verified—76.7%
LMArena WebDev—1482

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Qwen3.6 Max Preview
Vending-Bench 2—4,254

Reasoning Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 41.7 (#53)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Hard Prompts13741457
SimpleBench—63%
NYT Connections (extended)—74.1%
Chess Puzzles—20%
Mystery Game Puzzles—19%
DTBench—87.2%
LMCA—42.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—149.24

Math Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.1 (#46)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Math13591465
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—91.1%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—23.1%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—4.2%

Knowledge Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 57.6 (#39)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Expert13391478
GPQA Diamond—87.4%
SimpleQA Verified—52%

Multilingual Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.2 (#48)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Non-English13631437
LMArena Chinese14171487
LMArena French13911449
LMArena Russian13681445
LMArena German1355—
LMArena Japanese1342—
LMArena Korean1351—
LMArena Spanish—1454

Instruction Following Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 75.7 (#55)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Instruction Following13441438

Long Context Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 44.6 (#61)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Longer Query13661457

Writing & Preference Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 63.8 (#60)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Text13771447
LMArena Creative Writing13591435
LMArena Multi-Turn13871456

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or Qwen3.6 Max Preview better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.7 versus 40.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Qwen3.6 Max Preview share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Max Preview has 29.

Related comparisons

Go deeper