Model comparison
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs Qwen2-72B
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2-72B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 57.4 to 40.8.
- Qwen2-72B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Qwen2-72B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 30.0 |
| Released | — | 2024-06-07 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 26 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152), Qwen2-72B: 29.1 (#310)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | 1196 |
| WeirdML | — | 11.3% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 38.5% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —, Qwen2-72B: 17.0 (#146)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 1.1% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 29.9% |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113), Qwen2-72B: 23.2 (#181)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | 1191 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.28 |
Math Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154), Qwen2-72B: 30.2 (#236)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1359 | 1235 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.1% |
Knowledge Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161), Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#275)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | 1171 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 40.8% |
| MMLU | — | 82.4% |
Multilingual Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136), Qwen2-72B: 35.9 (#244)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1363 | 1176 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1417 | 1240 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | 1170 |
| LMArena German | 1355 | 1151 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1342 | 1111 |
| LMArena Korean | 1351 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 1368 | 1169 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1169 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158), Qwen2-72B: 61.7 (#241)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1344 | 1181 |
Long Context Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136), Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#235)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1366 | 1192 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128), Qwen2-72B: 40.8 (#241)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1203 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1359 | 1181 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1387 | 1196 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than Qwen2-72B?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or Qwen2-72B better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Qwen2-72B share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.