Model comparison

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs Qwen2-72B

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 Tencent

41.3

Rank #139 Confirmed

Qwen2-72B Alibaba (Qwen)

30.0

Rank #300 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2-72B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 57.4 to 40.8.
  • Qwen2-72B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Qwen2-72B specifications
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226Qwen2-72B
ProviderTencentAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index41.330.0
Released—2024-06-07
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1626

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152), Qwen2-72B: 29.1 (#310)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Qwen2-72B
LMArena Coding13611196
WeirdML—11.3%
BigCodeBench Instruct—38.5%
BigCodeBench Complete—54%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —, Qwen2-72B: 17.0 (#146)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Qwen2-72B
TheAgentCompany—1.1%
METR Time Horizons—29.9%

Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113), Qwen2-72B: 23.2 (#181)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Qwen2-72B
LMArena Hard Prompts13741191
Epoch Capabilities Index—125.28

Math Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154), Qwen2-72B: 30.2 (#236)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Qwen2-72B
LMArena Math13591235
MATH Level 5—39.1%

Knowledge Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161), Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#275)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Qwen2-72B
LMArena Expert13391171
GPQA Diamond—40.8%
MMLU—82.4%

Multilingual Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136), Qwen2-72B: 35.9 (#244)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Qwen2-72B
LMArena Non-English13631176
LMArena Chinese14171240
LMArena French13911170
LMArena German13551151
LMArena Japanese13421111
LMArena Korean13511083
LMArena Russian13681169
LMArena Spanish—1169

Instruction Following Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158), Qwen2-72B: 61.7 (#241)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Qwen2-72B
LMArena Instruction Following13441181

Long Context Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136), Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#235)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Qwen2-72B
LMArena Longer Query13661192

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128), Qwen2-72B: 40.8 (#241)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Qwen2-72B
LMArena Text13771203
LMArena Creative Writing13591181
LMArena Multi-Turn13871196

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than Qwen2-72B?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or Qwen2-72B better for coding?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Qwen2-72B share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.

Related comparisons

Go deeper