Model comparison
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 37.5 to 16.2.
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 30.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.80 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.7 (#169)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45% |
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.3% |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 19.2 (#266)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 128.52 |
Math Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 16.2 (#296)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 7.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1359 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.1% |
Knowledge Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#266)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1363 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1417 | — |
| LMArena French | 1391 | — |
| LMArena German | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1342 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1351 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1368 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1344 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1366 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1359 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1387 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 38.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.