Model comparison
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs Qwen Max
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen Max in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 37.5 to 22.3.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Qwen Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 34.7 |
| Released | — | 2024-04-03 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 33K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6.40 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152), Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | 1288 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 21.8% |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113), Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | 1269 |
Math Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154), Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1359 | 1275 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 16.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 67.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1% |
Knowledge Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161), Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | 1248 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
Multilingual Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136), Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1363 | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1417 | 1254 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | 1330 |
| LMArena German | 1355 | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1342 | 1205 |
| LMArena Korean | 1351 | 1142 |
| LMArena Russian | 1368 | 1274 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1290 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158), Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1344 | 1262 |
Long Context Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136), Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1366 | 1288 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128), Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1359 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1387 | 1277 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than Qwen Max?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or Qwen Max better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Qwen Max share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.