Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.6 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 2 categories and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 26.7 to 15.2.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 34.8 | 40.6 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 54 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.2 (#308), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 39.3 (#148)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1351 | 1361 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.0 (#85), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#308), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 26.7 (#115)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1374 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | — |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.1 (#127), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 34.8 (#155)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1351 | 1359 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#207), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 36.4 (#158)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1340 | 1338 |
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 35.9 (#74), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.6 (#144), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 49.1 (#132)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1362 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1416 |
| LMArena French | 1390 | 1390 |
| LMArena German | 1354 | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1293 | 1338 |
| LMArena Korean | 1314 | 1351 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1368 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.6 (#91), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.2 (#153)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1344 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |
Long Context Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#198), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#132)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1365 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.8 (#184), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.5 (#125)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1377 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1358 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1387 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Hunyuan Turbos 20250226?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.6 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.3 versus 28.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16.