Model comparison
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs o3-pro
o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- The widest gap is in long context, where o3-pro leads 72.2 to 41.6.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | o3-pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 42.9 |
| Released | — | 2025-06-10 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $80 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o3-pro leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152), o3-pro: 55.5 (#24)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 84.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 58.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113), o3-pro: 23.8 (#171)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 4.9% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 72.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 59.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | — |
| DTBench | — | 86.9% |
| LMCA | — | 38.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.42 |
Math Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154), o3-pro: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1359 | — |
Knowledge Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161), o3-pro: 29.5 (#238)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Confabulations | — | 14.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136), o3-pro: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1363 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1417 | — |
| LMArena French | 1391 | — |
| LMArena German | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1342 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1351 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1368 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158), o3-pro: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1344 | — |
Long Context o3-pro leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136), o3-pro: 72.2 (#1)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 97.2% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1366 | — |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128), o3-pro: 57.1 (#133)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1359 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 84.4% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1387 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than o3-pro?
o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or o3-pro better for coding?
o3-pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 40.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and o3-pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and o3-pro has 12.