Model comparison
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs MiMo-V2-Pro
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 2 categories and MiMo-V2-Pro in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 27.8 to 22.1.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | MiMo-V2-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 43.0 |
| Released | — | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152), MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | 1476 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1433 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.17 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113), MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | 1457 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 25.8% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |
Math MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154), MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1359 | 1447 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | 1478 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136), MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1363 | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1417 | 1456 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | 1469 |
| LMArena German | 1355 | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1342 | 1366 |
| LMArena Korean | 1351 | 1400 |
| LMArena Russian | 1368 | 1427 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1457 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158), MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1344 | 1445 |
Long Context Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1366 | 1455 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128), MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1359 | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1387 | 1456 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than MiMo-V2-Pro?
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 40.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and MiMo-V2-Pro share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.