Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs Kimi K3

Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 40.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 Tencent

40.6

Rank #138 Confirmed

Kimi K3 Moonshot AI

59.5

Rank #12 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K3 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K3 leads 74.0 to 34.8.
  • Kimi K3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226Kimi K3
ProviderTencentMoonshot AI
Noometry Index40.659.5
Released—2026-07-16
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—1.05M
Input $ / M tokens—$3
Output $ / M tokens—$15
Results tracked1653

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K3 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 39.3 (#148), Kimi K3: 60.6 (#8)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Kimi K3
LMArena Coding13611509
DeepSWE—68.5%
FrontierCode—44.2%
LMArena WebDev—1659
FrontierSWE—25.9%
SciCode—59.5%
WeirdML—82.6%
ALE-Bench—1,524

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —, Kimi K3: 41.8 (#19)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Kimi K3
APEX-Agents—50.6%
τ²-bench Banking—37.1%
PostTrainBench—32%
GBAEval—48.3%
GDP.pdf—19%
Vending-Bench 2—5,165

Reasoning Kimi K3 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 26.7 (#115), Kimi K3: 63.0 (#15)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Kimi K3
LMArena Hard Prompts13741495
ARC-AGI-2—60.4%
SimpleBench—60.7%
NYT Connections (extended)—93.6%
ARC-AGI-1—94.5%
CritPt—23.4%
Chess Puzzles—39%
Mystery Game Puzzles—26%
DTBench—91.2%
LMCA—52.7%
Surface Evolver Bench—95%
Epoch Capabilities Index—157.68
ForecastBench—61.1

Math Kimi K3 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 34.8 (#155), Kimi K3: 74.0 (#13)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Kimi K3
LMArena Math13591493
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—72.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4—39%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—87.8%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—97.2%
ProofBench—87%

Knowledge Kimi K3 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 36.4 (#158), Kimi K3: 63.2 (#19)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Kimi K3
LMArena Expert13381520
GPQA Diamond—93.1%
SimpleQA Verified—50.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —, Kimi K3: 38.4 (#58)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Kimi K3
Blueprint-Bench 2—29.5%
Furniture Assembly—34.2%

Multilingual Kimi K3 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 49.1 (#132), Kimi K3: 56.5 (#20)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Kimi K3
LMArena Non-English13621466
LMArena Chinese14161528
LMArena French13901488
LMArena German13561474
LMArena Japanese13381492
LMArena Korean13511465
LMArena Russian13681481
LMArena Spanish—1478

Instruction Following Kimi K3 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.2 (#153), Kimi K3: 77.8 (#13)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Kimi K3
LMArena Instruction Following13441481

Long Context Kimi K3 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#132), Kimi K3: 45.8 (#27)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Kimi K3
LMArena Longer Query13651494

Writing & Preference Kimi K3 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.5 (#125), Kimi K3: 76.7 (#4)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Kimi K3
LMArena Text13771476
LMArena Creative Writing13581452
LMArena Multi-Turn13871488
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—2082
EQ-Bench 4—1339

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 40.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or Kimi K3 better for coding?

Kimi K3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 60.6 versus 39.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Kimi K3 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K3 has 53.

Related comparisons

Go deeper