Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Hunyuan Turbos 20250226

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.7 Flash Google

59.8

Rank #14 Confirmed

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 Tencent

41.3

Rank #139 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 70.0 to 27.8.

Side by side

Gemini 3.7 FlashHunyuan Turbos 20250226
ProviderGoogleTencent
Noometry Index59.841.3
Released2026-08-13—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.75—
Output $ / M tokens$3.75—
Results tracked4416

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 56.2 (#22), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Coding14971361
DeepSWE65.5%—
FrontierCode43.6%—
LMArena WebDev1592—
FrontierSWE20.3%—
SciCode59.8%—
ALE-Bench904.3—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.1 (#19), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashHunyuan Turbos 20250226
APEX-Agents67.8%—
Remote Labor Index5%—
GDP.pdf23.8%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.0 (#15), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Hard Prompts14941374
ARC-AGI-284.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)94%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
CritPt14.3%—
Chess Puzzles47%—
Mystery Game Puzzles37%—
DTBench96.8%—
LMCA50.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index157.27—

Math Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.6 (#23), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Math15071359
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)71.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 436.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%—
ProofBench58%—

Knowledge Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.7 (#5), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Expert15081339
GPQA Diamond94.8%—
SimpleQA Verified69.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#73), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Vision1316—
Furniture Assembly26.7%—

Multilingual Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.6 (#7), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Non-English14841363
LMArena Chinese15481417
LMArena French15051391
LMArena German14981355
LMArena Japanese15121342
LMArena Korean14831351
LMArena Russian15161368
LMArena Spanish1503—

Instruction Following Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 77.7 (#15), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Instruction Following14831344

Long Context Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.7 (#30), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Longer Query14921366

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.2 (#20), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Text14861377
LMArena Creative Writing14901359
LMArena Multi-Turn14891387
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1723—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than Hunyuan Turbos 20250226?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash or Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better for coding?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.2 versus 40.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.7 Flash and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper