Model comparison

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 vs Qwen3 Max

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 Tencent

39.6

Rank #163 Confirmed

Qwen3 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

43.7

Rank #87 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3 Max in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3 Max leads 62.4 to 50.2.

Side by side

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Qwen3 Max specifications
Hunyuan Turbo 0110Qwen3 Max
ProviderTencentAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index39.643.7
Released—2025-09-23
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.20
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked1133

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3 Max leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171), Qwen3 Max: 43.0 (#93)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Qwen3 Max
LMArena Coding13191456
ALE-Bench—370.45

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Qwen3 Max: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Qwen3 Max
Vending-Bench 2—71.56

Reasoning Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137), Qwen3 Max: 22.6 (#190)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Qwen3 Max
LMArena Hard Prompts13081448
Kagi LLM Benchmark—72.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—30.1%
Chess Puzzles—4%
Mystery Game Puzzles—5%
DTBench—82.1%
LMCA—28.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—142.38

Math Qwen3 Max leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180), Qwen3 Max: 38.7 (#131)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Qwen3 Max
LMArena Math12731446
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—18.9%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—73.3%
MATH Level 5—97.1%

Knowledge Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#78)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Qwen3 Max
GPQA Diamond—72.6%
SimpleQA Verified—48.7%
LMArena Expert—1455

Multilingual Qwen3 Max leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184), Qwen3 Max: 53.7 (#62)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Qwen3 Max
LMArena Non-English12851429
LMArena Chinese13581478
LMArena Russian13051428
LMArena French—1449
LMArena German—1463
LMArena Japanese—1397
LMArena Korean—1399
LMArena Spanish—1462

Instruction Following Qwen3 Max leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195), Qwen3 Max: 74.8 (#87)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Qwen3 Max
LMArena Instruction Following12781419

Long Context Qwen3 Max leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168), Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#134)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Qwen3 Max
LMArena Longer Query13091438
Fiction.LiveBench—66.7%
CL-bench—14.5%

Writing & Preference Qwen3 Max leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183), Qwen3 Max: 62.4 (#76)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Qwen3 Max
LMArena Text13111439
LMArena Creative Writing12691402
LMArena Multi-Turn13031446

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better than Qwen3 Max?

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 or Qwen3 Max better for coding?

Qwen3 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Qwen3 Max share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper