Model comparison
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale vs Qwen3 Max
Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 39.7 on the Noometry Index. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale costs 2.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3 Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3 Max leads 62.4 to 46.0.
- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is cheaper at $0.58 / $1.68 per million input/output tokens, against $1.20 / $6 for Qwen3 Max.
- Qwen3 Max accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.
- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Qwen3 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.7 | 43.7 |
| Released | 2025-12-01 | 2025-09-23 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | 262K |
| Max output | 128K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.58 | $1.20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.68 | $6 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 33 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3 Max leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 40.4 (#140), Qwen3 Max: 43.0 (#93)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 46.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1456 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 370.45 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Qwen3 Max: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 71.56 |
Reasoning DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 32.9 (#73), Qwen3 Max: 22.6 (#190)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 52.6% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 72.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 30.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1448 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 5% |
| DTBench | — | 82.1% |
| LMCA | — | 28.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 142.38 |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Qwen3 Max: 38.7 (#131)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 18.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 73.3% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1446 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 97.1% |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#78)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 72.6% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 48.7% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1455 |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Qwen3 Max: 53.7 (#62)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1429 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1478 |
| LMArena French | — | 1449 |
| LMArena German | — | 1463 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1397 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1399 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1428 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1462 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Qwen3 Max: 74.8 (#87)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1419 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#134)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| CL-bench | — | 14.5% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1438 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3 Max leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 46.0 (#222), Qwen3 Max: 62.4 (#76)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1439 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1402 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1276 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1446 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale better than Qwen3 Max?
Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 39.7 on the Noometry Index. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale costs 2.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3 Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or Qwen3 Max?
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is cheaper. It lists at $0.58 per million input tokens and $1.68 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Max lists at $1.20 and $6.
Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or Qwen3 Max better for coding?
Qwen3 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 40.4 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3 Max does, with 262K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Qwen3 Max share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.