Model comparison
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 vs Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads 38.6 to 22.6.
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.6 | 33.4 |
| Released | — | 2024-09-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 33K |
| Max output | — | 29K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.66 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1 |
| Results tracked | 11 | 31 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 22.6 (#333)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | 1276 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 9% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 16.4% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 49% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 56.9% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 58% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 87.2% |
| MBPP+ | — | 77% |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 21.2 (#225)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1308 | 1251 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 42.1% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 49.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 119.49 |
| HellaSwag | — | 83% |
| LiveBench | — | 46.2% |
| WinoGrande | — | 80.8% |
Math Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.3 (#204)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1273 | 1251 |
| LiveBench Math | — | 46.6% |
| GSM8K | — | 93% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.4 (#203)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1221 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 70.5% |
| MMLU | — | 79.1% |
Multilingual Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 37.8 (#235)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1205 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1358 | 1222 |
| LMArena Russian | 1305 | 1228 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 61.4 (#245)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1278 | 1223 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 58.7% |
Long Context Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 38.0 (#208)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1309 | 1251 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 41.6 (#240)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | 1230 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1269 | 1174 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1303 | 1222 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 23.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better than Qwen2.5-Coder-32B?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 or Qwen2.5-Coder-32B better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 22.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has 31.