Model comparison

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale vs Qwen2.5-Coder-32B

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale DeepSeek

39.7

Rank #162 Reported

Qwen2.5-Coder-32B Alibaba (Qwen)

33.4

Rank #245 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads 40.4 to 22.6.
  • Qwen2.5-Coder-32B is cheaper at $0.66 / $1 per million input/output tokens, against $0.58 / $1.68 for DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale.
  • DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale accepts more context: 128K tokens versus 33K.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B specifications
DeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeQwen2.5-Coder-32B
ProviderDeepSeekAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index39.733.4
Released2025-12-012024-09-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K33K
Max output128K29K
Input $ / M tokens$0.58$0.66
Output $ / M tokens$1.68$1
Results tracked331

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 40.4 (#140), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 22.6 (#333)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeQwen2.5-Coder-32B
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—9%
Aider Polyglot—16.4%
WeirdML46.7%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—49%
LiveBench Coding—56.9%
LMArena Coding—1276
BigCodeBench Complete—58%
HumanEval+—87.2%
MBPP+—77%

Reasoning DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 32.9 (#73), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 21.2 (#225)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeQwen2.5-Coder-32B
SimpleBench52.6%—
LiveBench Reasoning—42.1%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1251
LiveBench Data Analysis—49.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—119.49
HellaSwag—83%
LiveBench—46.2%
WinoGrande—80.8%

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.3 (#204)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeQwen2.5-Coder-32B
LiveBench Math—46.6%
LMArena Math—1251
GSM8K—93%

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.4 (#203)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeQwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Expert—1221
ARC (AI2) Challenge—70.5%
MMLU—79.1%

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 37.8 (#235)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeQwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Non-English—1205
LMArena Chinese—1222
LMArena Russian—1228

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 61.4 (#245)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeQwen2.5-Coder-32B
LiveBench Instruction Following—58.7%
LMArena Instruction Following—1223

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 38.0 (#208)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeQwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Longer Query—1251

Writing & Preference DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 46.0 (#222), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 41.6 (#240)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeQwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Text—1230
LMArena Creative Writing—1174
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1276—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1222
LiveBench Language—23.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale better than Qwen2.5-Coder-32B?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or Qwen2.5-Coder-32B?

Qwen2.5-Coder-32B is cheaper. It lists at $0.66 per million input tokens and $1 per million output tokens; DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale lists at $0.58 and $1.68.

Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or Qwen2.5-Coder-32B better for coding?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 22.6 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale does, with 128K tokens against 33K.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has 31.

Related comparisons

Go deeper