Model comparison
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 vs Qwen Max
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen Max in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads 35.6 to 22.3.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.6 | 34.7 |
| Released | — | 2024-04-03 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 33K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6.40 |
| Results tracked | 11 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171), Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | 1288 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 21.8% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137), Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1308 | 1269 |
Math Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180), Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1273 | 1275 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 16.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 67.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1248 |
Multilingual Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184), Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1358 | 1254 |
| LMArena Russian | 1305 | 1274 |
| LMArena French | — | 1330 |
| LMArena German | — | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1205 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1142 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1290 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195), Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1278 | 1262 |
Long Context Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168), Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1309 | 1288 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183), Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1269 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1303 | 1277 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better than Qwen Max?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 or Qwen Max better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Qwen Max share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.