Model comparison

Nova 2 Lite vs Qwen Max

Nova 2 Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Nova 2 Lite Amazon

39.7

Rank #161 Confirmed

Qwen Max Alibaba (Qwen)

34.7

Rank #230 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Nova 2 Lite scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen Max in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Nova 2 Lite leads 37.5 to 22.3.
  • Nova 2 Lite is cheaper at $0.30 / $2.50 per million input/output tokens, against $1.60 / $6.40 for Qwen Max.
  • Nova 2 Lite accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 33K.

Side by side

Nova 2 Lite and Qwen Max specifications
Nova 2 LiteQwen Max
ProviderAmazonAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index39.734.7
Released2025-12-012024-04-03
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M33K
Max output64K8K
Input $ / M tokens$0.30$1.60
Output $ / M tokens$2.50$6.40
Results tracked1923

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nova 2 Lite leads

Nova 2 Lite: 40.7 (#134), Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen Max
LMArena Coding13851288
Aider Polyglot—21.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Nova 2 Lite: 24.1 (#121), Qwen Max: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen Max
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard27.1%—

Reasoning Nova 2 Lite leads

Nova 2 Lite: 27.5 (#118), Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen Max
LMArena Hard Prompts13641269

Math Nova 2 Lite leads

Nova 2 Lite: 37.5 (#156), Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen Max
LMArena Math13591275
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—16.1%
MATH Level 5—67.2%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—1%

Knowledge Nova 2 Lite leads

Nova 2 Lite: 43.0 (#94), Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen Max
LMArena Expert13581248
GPQA Diamond—56.1%
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.1%—

Multilingual Nova 2 Lite leads

Nova 2 Lite: 47.1 (#153), Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen Max
LMArena Non-English13371263
LMArena Chinese13641254
LMArena French13811330
LMArena German13431254
LMArena Japanese12711205
LMArena Korean12841142
LMArena Russian13431274
LMArena Spanish13731290

Instruction Following Nova 2 Lite leads

Nova 2 Lite: 70.5 (#161), Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen Max
LMArena Instruction Following13351262

Long Context Nova 2 Lite leads

Nova 2 Lite: 40.6 (#150), Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen Max
LMArena Longer Query13351288
Fiction.LiveBench—66.7%

Writing & Preference Nova 2 Lite leads

Nova 2 Lite: 53.9 (#154), Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen Max
LMArena Text13621282
LMArena Creative Writing12911248
LMArena Multi-Turn13381277

Frequently asked questions

Is Nova 2 Lite better than Qwen Max?

Nova 2 Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Nova 2 Lite or Qwen Max?

Nova 2 Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Qwen Max lists at $1.60 and $6.40.

Is Nova 2 Lite or Qwen Max better for coding?

Nova 2 Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.7 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Nova 2 Lite does, with 1M tokens against 33K.

How many benchmarks do Nova 2 Lite and Qwen Max share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova 2 Lite has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper