Model comparison
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 vs Phi-4
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher in 7 categories and Phi-4 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads 35.6 to 20.8.
- Phi-4 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Phi-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 39.6 | 31.2 |
| Released | — | 2024-12-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.07 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Results tracked | 11 | 37 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171), Phi-4: 34.4 (#239)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | 1231 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45.5% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 30.7% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 55.4% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Phi-4: 22.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.8% |
| BALROG | — | 11.6% |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137), Phi-4: 17.7 (#291)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1308 | 1220 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 1% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 47.8% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 45.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 130.42 |
| LiveBench | — | 41.6% |
Math Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180), Phi-4: 20.8 (#285)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1273 | 1246 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 13.8% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 42% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 64.9% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Phi-4: 32.6 (#209)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
| Confabulations | — | 29.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 3.7% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1203 |
| MMLU | — | 84.8% |
Multilingual Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184), Phi-4: 37.2 (#237)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1197 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1358 | 1212 |
| LMArena Russian | 1305 | 1209 |
| LMArena French | — | 1224 |
| LMArena German | — | 1222 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1158 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1151 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1234 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195), Phi-4: 60.4 (#251)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1278 | 1201 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 58.4% |
Long Context Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168), Phi-4: 36.9 (#226)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1309 | 1217 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183), Phi-4: 40.5 (#244)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | 1217 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1269 | 1182 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1303 | 1206 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 62.6% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 25.6% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better than Phi-4?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 or Phi-4 better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 34.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Phi-4 share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 has 37.