Noometry

Model comparison

Gemma 1.1 7b IT vs Hunyuan Turbo 0110

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 1.1 7b IT Google

31.3

Rank #277 Confirmed

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 Tencent

39.6

Rank #163 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 7b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads 50.2 to 30.4.
  • Gemma 1.1 7b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 1.1 7b ITHunyuan Turbo 0110
ProviderGoogleTencent
Noometry Index31.339.6
Released——
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1911

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.5 (#284), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171)

BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Coding10841319
HumanEval+35.4%—
MBPP+45%—

Reasoning Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 20.5 (#238), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137)

BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Hard Prompts10711308

Math Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#220), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180)

BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Math11071273

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#247), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —

BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Expert1039—

Multilingual Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.1 (#273), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184)

BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Non-English10521285
LMArena Chinese10611358
LMArena Russian10461305
LMArena French1065—
LMArena German1054—
LMArena Japanese971—
LMArena Korean988—
LMArena Spanish1049—

Instruction Following Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.0 (#283), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195)

BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Instruction Following10571278

Long Context Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.1 (#272), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168)

BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Longer Query10561309

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.4 (#288), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183)

BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Text10941311
LMArena Creative Writing10601269
LMArena Multi-Turn10401303

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT better than Hunyuan Turbo 0110?

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT or Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better for coding?

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 31.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper