Model comparison
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 vs phi-3-medium 14B
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads 32.9 to 25.2.
- phi-3-medium 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | phi-3-medium 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 39.0 | 29.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 11 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.0 (#168), phi-3-medium 14B: 36.3 (#198)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1320 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 25.0 (#135), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1308 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 121.18 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |
Math Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 32.9 (#180), phi-3-medium 14B: 25.2 (#249)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1273 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#301)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.5 (#178), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1358 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1305 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.7 (#190), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1279 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#163), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1309 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.4 (#176), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1269 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1303 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better than phi-3-medium 14B?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.0 versus 36.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and phi-3-medium 14B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.