Model comparison
Gemma 2B vs Hunyuan Turbo 0110
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads 50.4 to 24.1.
- Gemma 2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 2B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 39.0 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 23 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Gemma 2B: 28.9 (#300), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.0 (#168)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1320 |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Gemma 2B: 17.9 (#275), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 25.0 (#135)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1308 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 93.57 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |
Math Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Gemma 2B: 27.6 (#237), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 32.9 (#180)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1273 |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2B: —, Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Gemma 2B: 23.1 (#289), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.5 (#178)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1305 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Gemma 2B: 48.8 (#297), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.7 (#190)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 971 | 1279 |
Long Context Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#286), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#163)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1309 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Gemma 2B: 24.1 (#303), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.4 (#176)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 986 | 1269 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1303 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2B better than Hunyuan Turbo 0110?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2B or Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.0 versus 28.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11.