Model comparison
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 39.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 65.5 to 50.4.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 39.0 | 44.8 |
| Released | — | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 11 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.0 (#168), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.0 (#58)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1320 | 1502 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1477 |
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 899.8 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 25.0 (#135), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 25.9 (#124)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1308 | 1487 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 34.4% |
| CritPt | — | 4% |
| DTBench | — | 84.5% |
| LMCA | — | 29.5% |
Math MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 32.9 (#180), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 38.6 (#84)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1273 | 1480 |
| ProofBench | — | 22% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 41.5 (#100)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1501 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.5 (#178), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.3 (#33)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1449 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1358 | 1507 |
| LMArena Russian | 1305 | 1450 |
| LMArena French | — | 1489 |
| LMArena German | — | 1455 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1418 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1436 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1470 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.7 (#190), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.6 (#21)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1279 | 1477 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#163), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#38)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1309 | 1482 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.4 (#176), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.5 (#47)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | 1465 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1269 | 1440 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1303 | 1477 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1493 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1208 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 39.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.0 versus 38.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.