Noometry

Model comparison

GPT-5.4 mini vs Hunyuan Turbo 0110

GPT-5.4 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI

45.0

Rank #76 Confirmed

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 Tencent

39.6

Rank #163 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.4 mini scores higher in 7 categories and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GPT-5.4 mini leads 64.0 to 50.2.

Side by side

GPT-5.4 miniHunyuan Turbo 0110
ProviderOpenAITencent
Noometry Index45.039.6
Released2026-03-17—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window400K—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.75—
Output $ / M tokens$4.50—
Results tracked4611

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.4 mini leads

GPT-5.4 mini: 45.2 (#72), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171)

BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Coding14381319
FrontierCode27%—
LMArena WebDev1397—
SciCode49.9%—
WeirdML60.3%—
ALE-Bench1,189—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-5.4 mini: 29.9 (#81), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —

BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniHunyuan Turbo 0110
DeepResearch Bench36.3%—

Reasoning GPT-5.4 mini leads

GPT-5.4 mini: 30.4 (#85), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137)

BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Hard Prompts14241308
ARC-AGI-218.9%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark37.9%—
NYT Connections (extended)61.8%—
ARC-AGI-163.7%—
CritPt10%—
Chess Puzzles24%—
Thematic Generalization61.7%—
Mystery Game Puzzles11%—
DTBench80%—
LMCA40.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index148.84—
ForecastBench57—

Math GPT-5.4 mini leads

GPT-5.4 mini: 45.5 (#75), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180)

BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Math14191273
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)51.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 49.8%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202588.9%—
ProofBench21%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)28.3%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-5.4 mini: 51.5 (#67), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —

BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniHunyuan Turbo 0110
GPQA Diamond86.9%—
SimpleQA Verified29.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.5%—
LMArena Expert1435—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-5.4 mini: 39.7 (#56), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —

BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Vision1245—

Multilingual GPT-5.4 mini leads

GPT-5.4 mini: 51.9 (#96), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184)

BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Non-English14051285
LMArena Chinese14461358
LMArena Russian14171305
LMArena French1440—
LMArena German1409—
LMArena Japanese1374—
LMArena Korean1368—
LMArena Spanish1405—

Instruction Following GPT-5.4 mini leads

GPT-5.4 mini: 74.1 (#102), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195)

BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Instruction Following14051278

Long Context GPT-5.4 mini leads

GPT-5.4 mini: 43.0 (#112), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168)

BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Longer Query14071309

Writing & Preference GPT-5.4 mini leads

GPT-5.4 mini: 64.0 (#58), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183)

BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Text14121311
LMArena Creative Writing13701269
LMArena Multi-Turn14291303
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1665—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.4 mini better than Hunyuan Turbo 0110?

GPT-5.4 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-5.4 mini or Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better for coding?

GPT-5.4 mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.2 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 mini and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.4 mini has 46 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper