Model comparison
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
NVIDIASummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher in 3 categories and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 in 4 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 39.6 | 36.7 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 11 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 38.4 (#177)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | 1312 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 15.7 (#149)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 10% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 26.3 (#134)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1308 | 1316 |
Math Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 37.5 (#152)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1273 | 1360 |
Multilingual Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 43.1 (#187)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1282 |
| LMArena Russian | 1305 | 1284 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1358 | — |
Instruction Following Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 69.0 (#178)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1278 | 1308 |
Long Context Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 39.5 (#177)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1309 | 1299 |
Writing & Preference Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 52.2 (#175)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | 1320 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1269 | 1314 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1303 | 1317 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better than Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 or Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (38.6 vs 38.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 has 11.