Model comparison

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 vs Kimi K3

Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 Tencent

39.6

Rank #163 Confirmed

Kimi K3 Moonshot AI

59.5

Rank #15 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K3 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K3 leads 74.2 to 35.6.
  • Kimi K3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Kimi K3 specifications
Hunyuan Turbo 0110Kimi K3
ProviderTencentMoonshot AI
Noometry Index39.659.5
Released—2026-07-16
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—1.05M
Input $ / M tokens—$3
Output $ / M tokens—$15
Results tracked1153

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K3 leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171), Kimi K3: 61.0 (#10)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Kimi K3
LMArena Coding13191508
DeepSWE—68.5%
FrontierCode—44.2%
LMArena WebDev—1654
FrontierSWE—25.9%
SciCode—59.5%
WeirdML—82.6%
ALE-Bench—1,524

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Kimi K3: 41.8 (#20)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Kimi K3
APEX-Agents—50.6%
τ²-bench Banking—37.1%
PostTrainBench—32%
GBAEval—48.3%
GDP.pdf—19%
Vending-Bench 2—5,165

Reasoning Kimi K3 leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137), Kimi K3: 63.0 (#17)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Kimi K3
LMArena Hard Prompts13081496
ARC-AGI-2—60.4%
SimpleBench—60.7%
NYT Connections (extended)—93.6%
ARC-AGI-1—94.5%
CritPt—23.4%
Chess Puzzles—39%
Mystery Game Puzzles—26%
DTBench—91.2%
LMCA—52.7%
Surface Evolver Bench—95%
Epoch Capabilities Index—157.45
ForecastBench—61.1

Math Kimi K3 leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180), Kimi K3: 74.2 (#16)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Kimi K3
LMArena Math12731491
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—72.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4—39%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—87.8%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—97.2%
ProofBench—87%

Knowledge Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Kimi K3: 63.2 (#21)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Kimi K3
GPQA Diamond—93.1%
SimpleQA Verified—50.6%
LMArena Expert—1521

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Kimi K3: 37.8 (#70)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Kimi K3
Blueprint-Bench 2—29.5%
Furniture Assembly—34.2%

Multilingual Kimi K3 leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184), Kimi K3: 56.3 (#21)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Kimi K3
LMArena Non-English12851466
LMArena Chinese13581529
LMArena Russian13051482
LMArena French—1491
LMArena German—1488
LMArena Japanese—1487
LMArena Korean—1458
LMArena Spanish—1472

Instruction Following Kimi K3 leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195), Kimi K3: 77.7 (#14)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Kimi K3
LMArena Instruction Following12781483

Long Context Kimi K3 leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168), Kimi K3: 45.8 (#29)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Kimi K3
LMArena Longer Query13091494

Writing & Preference Kimi K3 leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183), Kimi K3: 76.6 (#4)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Kimi K3
LMArena Text13111476
LMArena Creative Writing12691454
LMArena Multi-Turn13031488
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—2082
EQ-Bench 4—1339

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better than Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 or Kimi K3 better for coding?

Kimi K3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 61.0 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Kimi K3 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K3 has 53.

Related comparisons

Go deeper