Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Hunyuan Turbo 0110

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.7 Flash Google

59.8

Rank #14 Confirmed

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 Tencent

39.6

Rank #163 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher in 7 categories and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 70.0 to 26.1.

Side by side

Gemini 3.7 FlashHunyuan Turbo 0110
ProviderGoogleTencent
Noometry Index59.839.6
Released2026-08-13—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.75—
Output $ / M tokens$3.75—
Results tracked4411

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 56.2 (#22), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Coding14971319
DeepSWE65.5%—
FrontierCode43.6%—
LMArena WebDev1592—
FrontierSWE20.3%—
SciCode59.8%—
ALE-Bench904.3—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.1 (#19), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashHunyuan Turbo 0110
APEX-Agents67.8%—
Remote Labor Index5%—
GDP.pdf23.8%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.0 (#15), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Hard Prompts14941308
ARC-AGI-284.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)94%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
CritPt14.3%—
Chess Puzzles47%—
Mystery Game Puzzles37%—
DTBench96.8%—
LMCA50.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index157.27—

Math Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.6 (#23), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Math15071273
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)71.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 436.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%—
ProofBench58%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.7 (#5), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashHunyuan Turbo 0110
GPQA Diamond94.8%—
SimpleQA Verified69.2%—
LMArena Expert1508—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#73), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Vision1316—
Furniture Assembly26.7%—

Multilingual Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.6 (#7), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Non-English14841285
LMArena Chinese15481358
LMArena Russian15161305
LMArena French1505—
LMArena German1498—
LMArena Japanese1512—
LMArena Korean1483—
LMArena Spanish1503—

Instruction Following Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 77.7 (#15), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Instruction Following14831278

Long Context Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.7 (#30), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Longer Query14921309

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.2 (#20), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Text14861311
LMArena Creative Writing14901269
LMArena Multi-Turn14891303
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1723—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than Hunyuan Turbo 0110?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash or Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better for coding?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.2 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.7 Flash and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper