Model comparison
Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Yi-Lightning
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-Lightning in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 40.9 to 27.4.
Side by side
| Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Yi-Lightning | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 37.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-12-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), Yi-Lightning: 27.4 (#320)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1312 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 12.9% |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), Yi-Lightning: 25.9 (#139)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1302 |
Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), Yi-Lightning: 36.2 (#172)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1414 | 1300 |
Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), Yi-Lightning: 35.4 (#185)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | 1286 |
Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), Yi-Lightning: 42.2 (#196)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | 1269 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1320 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | 1385 | 1255 |
| LMArena French | — | 1305 |
| LMArena German | — | 1267 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1228 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1315 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), Yi-Lightning: 67.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1374 | 1278 |
Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), Yi-Lightning: 39.4 (#181)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | 1297 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), Yi-Lightning: 50.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | 1302 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1280 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1311 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Yi-Lightning?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Yi-Lightning better for coding?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 27.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Yi-Lightning share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Yi-Lightning has 18.