Model comparison
Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Qwen3.5 Plus
Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Qwen3.5 Plus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.8 vs 42.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 47.9 to 36.0.
Side by side
| Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen3.5 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 42.3 |
| Released | — | 2026-02-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.40 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.2 (#129), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1389 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 621.92 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 0.54 |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 Plus leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 27.3 (#106), Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.0 (#67)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 80.5% |
| LMCA | — | 36.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.79 |
Math Qwen3.5 Plus leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 36.0 (#132), Qwen3.5 Plus: 47.9 (#55)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1414 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 21% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |
Knowledge Qwen3.5 Plus leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.1 (#139), Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#78)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 25.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.4 (#107), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1424 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1403 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1384 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.8 (#130), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1375 | — |
Long Context Too close to call
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#123), Qwen3.5 Plus: 42.9 (#109)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 19.8% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 12.4% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.7 (#105), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Qwen3.5 Plus?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Qwen3.5 Plus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.8 vs 42.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Qwen3.5 Plus share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.