Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan T1 20250711 Tencent

42.5

Rank #114 Confirmed

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct Alibaba (Qwen)

31.9

Rank #267 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 38.7 to 19.3.
  • Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan T1 20250711Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
ProviderTencentAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index42.531.9
Released—2024-09
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.40
Output $ / M tokens—$5.60
Results tracked1343

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 33.2 (#260)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Coding13901292
WeirdML—16%
BigCodeBench Instruct—45.8%
BigCodeBench Complete—55.9%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan T1 20250711: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 22.1 (#133)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
TheAgentCompany—5.7%
BALROG—16.2%
METR Time Horizons—35.8%

Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 22.3 (#199)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13991271
DTBench—62.9%
LMCA—13.4%
BIG-Bench Hard—79.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index—129
ForecastBench—57.5
HellaSwag—84.8%
PIQA—82.6%
WinoGrande—82.3%

Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 19.3 (#287)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Math14141283
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—8.1%
Omni-MATH—33%
MATH Level 5—63.2%

Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 27.0 (#253)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Expert13951245
GPQA Diamond—49.1%
MMLU-Pro—63.1%
Confabulations—19.1%
GPQA (HELM)—42.6%
ARC (AI2) Challenge—94.5%
MMLU—85.3%
TriviaQA—71.9%

Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 41.0 (#213)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Non-English13951252
LMArena Chinese14251272
LMArena Korean14061188
LMArena Russian13851264
LMArena French—1280
LMArena German—1234
LMArena Japanese—1180
LMArena Spanish—1256

Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 65.5 (#221)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13741254
IFEval—80.6%

Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 38.9 (#188)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13841282

Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 46.7 (#215)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Text14011269
LMArena Creative Writing13921221
LMArena Multi-Turn13931272
WildBench—80.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct better for coding?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 33.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has 43.

Related comparisons

Go deeper