Model comparison
Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Mercury 2
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 7 categories and Mercury 2 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 40.9 to 33.5.
Side by side
| Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mercury 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Inception |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 39.1 |
| Released | — | 2026-02-20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 50K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.75 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), Mercury 2: 33.5 (#255)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1391 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1171 |
| SciCode | — | 38.7% |
| WeirdML | — | 43.2% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.58 |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), Mercury 2: 23.8 (#170)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1362 |
| CritPt | — | 0.8% |
Math Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), Mercury 2: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1414 | — |
Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), Mercury 2: 36.2 (#172)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | 1358 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.3% |
Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), Mercury 2: 46.6 (#157)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | 1331 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1417 |
| LMArena Russian | 1385 | 1304 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), Mercury 2: 70.2 (#165)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1374 | 1329 |
Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), Mercury 2: 40.5 (#154)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | 1330 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), Mercury 2: 53.8 (#155)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | 1355 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1289 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1358 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Mercury 2?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Mercury 2 better for coding?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 33.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Mercury 2 share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Mercury 2 has 17.