Model comparison
Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Mistral Small 3.1
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Mistral AISummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 8 categories and Mistral Small 3.1 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 59.7 to 37.2.
- Mistral Small 3.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mistral Small 3.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 31.4 |
| Released | — | 2025-03-17 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 102K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.35 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.56 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 28 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.2 (#129), Mistral Small 3.1: 37.7 (#175)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1389 | 1309 |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 27.3 (#106), Mistral Small 3.1: 18.9 (#249)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1278 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 127.48 |
Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 36.0 (#132), Mistral Small 3.1: 13.7 (#295)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1414 | 1261 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 3.9% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 24.8% |
Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.1 (#139), Mistral Small 3.1: 22.6 (#266)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | 1258 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41.9% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 61% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 39.2% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 32.6 (#93)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1136 |
Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.4 (#107), Mistral Small 3.1: 41.4 (#204)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1424 | 1254 |
| LMArena Korean | 1403 | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | 1384 | 1263 |
| LMArena French | — | 1270 |
| LMArena German | — | 1266 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1210 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1283 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.8 (#130), Mistral Small 3.1: 63.8 (#225)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1375 | 1264 |
| IFEval | — | 75% |
Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#123), Mistral Small 3.1: 39.5 (#172)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | 1300 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.7 (#105), Mistral Small 3.1: 37.2 (#254)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | 1278 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | 1253 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1270 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 761 |
| WildBench | — | 78.8% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Mistral Small 3.1?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Mistral Small 3.1 better for coding?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 37.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Mistral Small 3.1 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.1 has 28.