Model comparison
GPT-5 Nano vs Hunyuan T1 20250711
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 33.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5 Nano scores higher in 1 category and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 59.5 to 39.1.
Side by side
| GPT-5 Nano | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 33.5 | 42.5 |
| Released | 2025-08-07 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 400K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.05 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Results tracked | 49 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
GPT-5 Nano: 33.6 (#254), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Nano | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1351 | 1390 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 34.8% | — |
| WeirdML | 38.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 718.67 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-5 Nano: 25.8 (#106), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Nano | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 21.8% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 51.5% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
GPT-5 Nano: 16.3 (#306), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Nano | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1328 | 1399 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 2.6% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 62.2% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 20.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 27% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 9% | — |
| DTBench | 62.7% | — |
| LMCA | 7.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 139.38 | — |
| ForecastBench | 59.1 | — |
Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
GPT-5 Nano: 29.4 (#241), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Nano | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1317 | 1414 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 20% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 2.4% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 81.1% | — |
| ProofBench | 12% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 54.6% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 95.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 8.3% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 2.1% | — |
Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
GPT-5 Nano: 35.9 (#178), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Nano | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1321 | 1395 |
| GPQA Diamond | 69.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 11.7% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 77.8% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 67.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-5 Nano: 31.3 (#108), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Nano | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1159 | — |
| VPCT | 37.2% | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
GPT-5 Nano: 45.3 (#172), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Nano | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1356 | 1425 |
| LMArena Korean | 1269 | 1406 |
| LMArena Russian | 1296 | 1385 |
| LMArena German | 1327 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1226 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1360 | — |
Instruction Following GPT-5 Nano leads
GPT-5 Nano: 75.0 (#79), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Nano | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1306 | 1374 |
| IFEval | 93.2% | — |
Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
GPT-5 Nano: 31.3 (#281), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Nano | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1312 | 1384 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 44.4% | — |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
GPT-5 Nano: 39.1 (#249), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Nano | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1320 | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1249 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1311 | 1393 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 705 | — |
| WildBench | 80.6% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5 Nano better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 33.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-5 Nano or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 33.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5 Nano and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5 Nano has 49 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.