Model comparison
Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Mistral AISummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 3 categories and Mistral Medium 3.5 in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 27.3 to 16.6.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mistral Medium 3.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 39.6 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 210K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $7.50 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.2 (#129), Mistral Medium 3.5: 35.7 (#208)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1389 | 1461 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1263 |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 27.3 (#106), Mistral Medium 3.5: 16.6 (#290)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1436 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 41.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 12.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 141.42 |
Math Too close to call
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 36.0 (#132), Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.4 (#113)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1414 | 1432 |
Knowledge Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.1 (#139), Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.3 (#123)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | 1431 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 37.6 (#64)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1222 |
Multilingual Too close to call
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.4 (#107), Mistral Medium 3.5: 52.1 (#93)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | 1405 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1424 | 1443 |
| LMArena Korean | 1403 | 1387 |
| LMArena Russian | 1384 | 1396 |
| LMArena French | — | 1448 |
| LMArena German | — | 1453 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1406 |
Instruction Following Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.8 (#130), Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.7 (#87)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1375 | 1414 |
Long Context Too close to call
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#123), Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#101)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | 1414 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.7 (#105), Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.6 (#113)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | 1421 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | 1372 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1423 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 993 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Mistral Medium 3.5?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Mistral Medium 3.5 better for coding?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 35.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Mistral Medium 3.5 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22.