Model comparison
Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs MiniMax-M2.7
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
MiniMaxSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 5 categories and MiniMax-M2.7 in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 38.7 to 25.9.
- MiniMax-M2.7 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiniMax-M2.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 37.7 |
| Released | — | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 205K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 30 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), MiniMax-M2.7: 41.8 (#120)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1454 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1398 |
| SciCode | — | 47% |
| WeirdML | — | 37% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 599.25 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 25.1 (#111)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 45.1% |
| ExploitBench | — | 13.3% |
| GBAEval | — | 0% |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), MiniMax-M2.7: 19.7 (#253)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1422 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 24.7% |
| CritPt | — | 0.6% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 39.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 145.85 |
Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), MiniMax-M2.7: 25.9 (#263)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1414 | 1420 |
| ProofBench | — | 3% |
Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), MiniMax-M2.7: 37.7 (#152)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | 1444 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.9% |
Multilingual Too close to call
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), MiniMax-M2.7: 50.3 (#123)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1441 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1313 |
| LMArena Russian | 1385 | 1383 |
| LMArena French | — | 1421 |
| LMArena German | — | 1398 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1403 |
Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.7 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), MiniMax-M2.7: 74.1 (#103)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1374 | 1405 |
Long Context MiniMax-M2.7 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#99)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | 1419 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), MiniMax-M2.7: 58.9 (#112)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | 1405 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1354 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1412 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than MiniMax-M2.7?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or MiniMax-M2.7 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (40.9 vs 41.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and MiniMax-M2.7 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.7 has 30.