Model comparison
Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 54.5 to 38.7.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 50.3 |
| Released | — | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1534 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1629 |
| SciCode | — | 60.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,158 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 59.5% |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1512 |
| CritPt | — | 26.6% |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1414 | 1494 |
| ProofBench | — | 70% |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | 1543 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1264 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1529 |
| LMArena Russian | 1385 | 1480 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1374 | 1493 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | 1501 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | 1492 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1468 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1464 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 40.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.