Model comparison
Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs MiMo-V2.5
Hunyuan T1 20250711 and MiMo-V2.5 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.5 vs 43.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2.5 in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 43.9 to 40.9.
- MiMo-V2.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 43.4 |
| Released | — | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1469 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1438 |
| SciCode | — | 43.1% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 513.95 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1450 |
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1414 | 1436 |
| ProofBench | — | 16% |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.5 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | 1460 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: —, MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1247 |
Multilingual Too close to call
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1468 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1363 |
| LMArena Russian | 1385 | 1395 |
| LMArena French | — | 1447 |
| LMArena German | — | 1421 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1306 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1416 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1374 | 1434 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.5 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | 1445 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | 1428 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1393 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1445 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than MiMo-V2.5?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 and MiMo-V2.5 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.5 vs 43.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or MiMo-V2.5 better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 40.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and MiMo-V2.5 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5 has 23.