Model comparison
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Hunyuan T1 20250711
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher in 5 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 3 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads 47.6 to 38.7.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 43.5 | 42.5 |
| Released | 2026-04-02 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.0675 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.23 | — |
| Results tracked | 28 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.0 (#164), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1447 | 1390 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1359 | — |
| SciCode | 40% | — |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 927.17 | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.8 (#213), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1439 | 1399 |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 6% | — |
| DTBench | 74.9% | — |
| LMCA | 29.7% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.85 | — |
Math Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 47.6 (#67), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1470 | 1414 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 82.2% | — |
Knowledge Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#85), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1447 | 1395 |
| GPQA Diamond | 73.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 40.6 (#46), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1260 | — |
Multilingual Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.1 (#71), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1421 | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | 1425 |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | 1385 |
| LMArena French | 1460 | — |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1406 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1417 | — |
Instruction Following Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 74.8 (#82), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1374 |
Long Context Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#91), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 1384 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.6 (#115), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1434 | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1402 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 1393 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1305 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 39.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.