Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Llama 3.1-405B

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan T1 20250711 Tencent

42.5

Rank #114 Confirmed

Llama 3.1-405B Meta

30.7

Rank #288 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 3.1-405B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 59.5 to 38.9.
  • Llama 3.1-405B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan T1 20250711Llama 3.1-405B
ProviderTencentMeta
Noometry Index42.530.7
Released—2024-07-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1342

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), Llama 3.1-405B: 33.1 (#262)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Llama 3.1-405B
LMArena Coding13901291
WeirdML—21.4%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan T1 20250711: —, Llama 3.1-405B: 21.0 (#140)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Llama 3.1-405B
TheAgentCompany—7.4%
Cybench—7.5%

Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), Llama 3.1-405B: 16.8 (#300)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Llama 3.1-405B
LMArena Hard Prompts13991269
SimpleBench—23%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—45%
DTBench—61.4%
BIG-Bench Hard—82.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—128.75
ForecastBench—59.9
HellaSwag—89.2%
PIQA—85.9%
WinoGrande—89.2%

Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), Llama 3.1-405B: 18.4 (#290)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Llama 3.1-405B
LMArena Math14141281
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—9.7%
Omni-MATH—24.9%
MATH Level 5—49.8%

Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), Llama 3.1-405B: 30.4 (#227)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Llama 3.1-405B
LMArena Expert13951243
GPQA Diamond—50.9%
MMLU-Pro—72.3%
Confabulations—17.6%
GPQA (HELM)—52.2%
ARC (AI2) Challenge—95.3%
MMLU—84.5%
TriviaQA—82.7%

Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), Llama 3.1-405B: 40.7 (#214)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Llama 3.1-405B
LMArena Non-English13951248
LMArena Chinese14251242
LMArena Korean14061184
LMArena Russian13851265
LMArena French—1279
LMArena German—1252
LMArena Japanese—1208
LMArena Spanish—1260

Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), Llama 3.1-405B: 65.9 (#214)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Llama 3.1-405B
LMArena Instruction Following13741259
IFEval—81.1%

Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), Llama 3.1-405B: 38.4 (#197)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Llama 3.1-405B
LMArena Longer Query13841266

Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), Llama 3.1-405B: 38.9 (#251)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Llama 3.1-405B
LMArena Text14011284
LMArena Creative Writing13921262
LMArena Multi-Turn13931297
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—870
WildBench—78.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Llama 3.1-405B?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Llama 3.1-405B better for coding?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 33.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Llama 3.1-405B share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1-405B has 42.

Related comparisons

Go deeper