Model comparison
Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Llama 13b
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
MetaSummary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 13b in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 59.5 to 13.8.
- Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Llama 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 24.4 |
| Released | — | 2023-02-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 683 |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 728 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 37.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 100.58 |
| HellaSwag | — | 79.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 75.2% |
| PIQA | — | 80.1% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73% |
Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1414 | 838 |
| GSM8K | — | 20.6% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 52.7% |
| BoolQ | — | 78.7% |
| MMLU | — | 47.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 56.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 77.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: —, Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 43.3% |
Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | 819 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1385 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1374 | 781 |
Long Context Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | — |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | 834 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 794 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 753 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Llama 13b?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Llama 13b better for coding?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Llama 13b share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.