Model comparison
Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 1 category and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 50.9 to 38.8.
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 45.8 |
| Released | — | 2025-11-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.4 (#178)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1454 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1322 |
Reasoning Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 32.5 (#75)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1428 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
Math Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 47.4 (#68)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1414 | 1429 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 83.1% |
Knowledge Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#69)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | 1439 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.2% |
Multilingual Too close to call
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.4 (#109)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | 1398 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1456 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1330 |
| LMArena Russian | 1385 | 1391 |
| LMArena French | — | 1425 |
| LMArena German | — | 1390 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1357 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1406 |
Instruction Following Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.0 (#109)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1374 | 1403 |
Long Context Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#102)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | 1415 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.0 (#104)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | 1415 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1374 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1414 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo?
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better for coding?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 38.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21.