Model comparison
GPT-5.3 Codex vs Hunyuan T1 20250711
GPT-5.3 Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-5.3 Codex leads 48.6 to 40.9.
Side by side
| GPT-5.3 Codex | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 45.8 | 42.5 |
| Released | 2026-02-05 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 400K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.75 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $14 | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.3 Codex leads
GPT-5.3 Codex: 48.6 (#56), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Codex | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 74.8% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1409 | — |
| WeirdML | 79.3% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1390 |
| ALE-Bench | 1,655 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-5.3 Codex: 48.0 (#9), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Codex | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 78.4% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 74.5% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,940 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
GPT-5.3 Codex: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Codex | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1399 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 156.77 | — |
Math Not comparable
GPT-5.3 Codex: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Codex | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1414 |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-5.3 Codex: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Codex | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1395 |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5.3 Codex: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Codex | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1425 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1406 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1385 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5.3 Codex: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Codex | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1374 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5.3 Codex: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Codex | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1384 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5.3 Codex: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Codex | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1393 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.3 Codex better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?
GPT-5.3 Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-5.3 Codex or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?
GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 40.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.3 Codex and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.3 Codex has 8 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.