Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Kimi K2.5

Kimi K2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan T1 20250711 Tencent

42.5

Rank #114 Confirmed

Kimi K2.5 Moonshot AI

48.1

Rank #57 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2.5 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2.5 leads 53.6 to 38.8.
  • Kimi K2.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan T1 20250711Kimi K2.5
ProviderTencentMoonshot AI
Noometry Index42.548.1
Released—2026-01-27
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—262K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.45
Output $ / M tokens—$2.25
Results tracked1351

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2.5 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), Kimi K2.5: 48.8 (#53)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Kimi K2.5
LMArena Coding13901474
SWE-bench Verified—73.8%
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—70.8%
LMArena WebDev—1437
SWE-bench Multilingual—67.3%
SciCode—49%
WeirdML—45.6%
ALE-Bench—821.65

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan T1 20250711: —, Kimi K2.5: 34.2 (#48)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Kimi K2.5
Terminal-Bench—43.2%
OSWorld—63.3%
Vending-Bench 2—1,198

Reasoning Kimi K2.5 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), Kimi K2.5: 31.2 (#80)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Kimi K2.5
LMArena Hard Prompts13991453
ARC-AGI-2—11.8%
SimpleBench—46.8%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—78.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—69.9%
ARC-AGI-1—65.3%
CritPt—3.1%
Chess Puzzles—12%
EnigmaEval—3.4%
Thematic Generalization—69.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—148.03

Math Kimi K2.5 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), Kimi K2.5: 51.8 (#53)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Kimi K2.5
LMArena Math14141470
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—62.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—92.2%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—27.9%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—4.2%

Knowledge Kimi K2.5 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), Kimi K2.5: 53.6 (#56)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Kimi K2.5
LMArena Expert13951466
GPQA Diamond—87.6%
Humanity's Last Exam—24.4%
SimpleQA Verified—34.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—14.2%

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan T1 20250711: —, Kimi K2.5: 41.1 (#39)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Kimi K2.5
LMArena Vision—1269
LMArena Document—1430

Multilingual Kimi K2.5 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), Kimi K2.5: 53.9 (#53)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Kimi K2.5
LMArena Non-English13951433
LMArena Chinese14251495
LMArena Korean14061410
LMArena Russian13851435
LMArena French—1454
LMArena German—1441
LMArena Japanese—1421
LMArena Spanish—1450

Instruction Following Kimi K2.5 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), Kimi K2.5: 75.3 (#64)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Kimi K2.5
LMArena Instruction Following13741431

Long Context Kimi K2.5 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), Kimi K2.5: 52.1 (#7)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Kimi K2.5
LMArena Longer Query13841445
Fiction.LiveBench—86.1%
CL-bench—19.3%
CL-bench Life—13.2%

Writing & Preference Kimi K2.5 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), Kimi K2.5: 65.1 (#53)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Kimi K2.5
LMArena Text14011445
LMArena Creative Writing13921423
LMArena Multi-Turn13931444
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1579

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Kimi K2.5?

Kimi K2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Kimi K2.5 better for coding?

Kimi K2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.8 versus 40.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Kimi K2.5 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.5 has 51.

Related comparisons

Go deeper